honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Wednesday, March 26, 2008

UH professor offers alternatives to rail system

By Dan Nakaso
Advertiser Staff Writer

Hawaii news photo - The Honolulu Advertiser

Panos Prevedouros, professor of transportation engineering at the University of Hawai'i-Manoa, gave a lecture to the media yesterday on a transportation study that he and 16 of his students worked on that offers five congestion-relief alternatives for O'ahu traffic.

DEBORAH BOOKER | The Honolulu Advertiser

spacer spacer

A new study concludes that a system of high-occupancy toll lanes, bus rapid transit, highway underpasses and a Pearl Harbor car ferry would cost a third of the price of a starter rail system while moving people and traffic quicker and more efficiently.

The study, released yesterday by Panos Prevedouros, a University of Hawai'i transportation engineering professor and 16 of his graduate and undergraduate students, claims to be the state's largest-ever simulation study of five alternatives to relieve traffic congestion.

Compared to the city's plans for a steel-rail system, alternatives using less public money "can provide a much better outcome in terms of improvement to traffic conditions, and many of the non-rail alternatives are more sustainable and have a smaller carbon footprint, that is, they are superior in terms of energy and pollution for the planet," according to the study.

The study also found:

  • Rail transit would cost $5 billion but reduce H-1 Freeway congestion only by 3 percent, cutting drive times from 34 to 33 minutes.

  • High-occupancy toll lanes would cost $1 billion and would allow buses and vehicles with five or more people to travel for free at an average speed of 60 mph versus rail's 25 mph. Peak toll prices would run $3.50 per vehicle while reducing H-1 congestion by 35 percent, cutting drive times from 34 to 22 minutes, according to the study. Express bus commuters would make the same trip in 12.7 minutes.

  • Underpasses at Honolulu's four busiest intersections would cost $50 million to $100 million. "The vehicles using the underpass receive in essence a constant green light and their delay is reduced to practically zero," according to the report.

  • A reversible, two-lane tunnel under the entrance of Pearl Harbor would cost $3 billion to $5 billion and connect traffic to the Nimitz Viaduct, reducing drive times from 'Ewa to Downtown from 65 minutes to 11 minutes.

  • A Pearl Harbor car ferry system could barge up to 500 vehicles per hour across the mouth of Pearl Harbor, connecting drivers to Lagoon Drive near the airport. The study gave no cost estimate for a ferry system.

    At a presentation yesterday at the state Capitol, Prevedouros acknowledged some difficulties in getting parts of the plan implemented, such as finding funding and getting permission from the Navy.

    Money collected from the general excise tax that's earmarked for the city's rail project is prohibited from being used for HOT lanes. Prevedouros said some legislators are trying to get that restriction lifted.

    Prevedouros was the only member of a panel of city-appointed experts in February to go against recommending steel- wheel-and-rail technology as the best choice for Honolulu's planned $3.7 billion elevated commuter line.

    Following yesterday's briefing, Mayor Mufi Hannemann blasted Prevedouros and the subjects of his study.

    "It's all political with Panos," Hannemann said. "These are all old ideas that have been studied before and have not been able to generate any momentum and support. The big question is the lack of a funding source. You can't unilaterally move the GET (tax) and Panos knows that."

    The city was unable to use Iroquois Point for its commuter ferry program called TheBoat, Hannemann said. Proposals for a Pearl Harbor vehicle ferry and underground Pearl Harbor tunnel would face similar obstacles, Hannemann said.

    "It's very problematic given national security concerns," he said. "This is just another desperate attempt by Panos to try and thwart a fixed-guideway system. He's going against the grain of what most cities are trying to do."

    Hannemann said nonrail options lack opportunities for economic development at rail stations.

    "With a fixed guideway," Hannemann said, "we can have commercial, retail, housing, park space and bike lanes."

    Reach Dan Nakaso at dnakaso@honoluluadvertiser.com.