honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Friday, October 19, 2007

COMMENTARY
Hawaii has history of opportunities lost

By Sen. Fred Hemmings

It is an ongoing tragedy that for several generations great opportunities in Hawai'i have been lost due to a small vocal minority. Opportunities that would benefit the overwhelming majority of people in Hawai'i, such as the Superferry, have been scuttled by vociferous and oftentimes ill-informed protestors. The contradictory arguments of those opposed to the Superferry are missing the essence of the situation. We all should be most concerned that once again Hawai'i stands to lose a valuable asset for its people unless something is done soon.

"What if" scenarios are fueling the argument against the Superferry. The opposition speculates they are receiving a tax subsidy from the state. This is untrue. Superferry is like everyone else that uses harbor resources. This money does not come from the taxpayer's general fund. Rather, it is a bond issuance that will be paid back by funds collected from harbor users such as Matson, Young Brothers, Superferry and the cruise lines. The money fronted by the state that was used for harbor improvements to accommodate the Superferry is an asset owned by the state that will be paid back by the Superferry's fees.

Another claim is that the Superferry will lead to increased traffic and cars on the outer islands. The Superferry is not going to be a one-way outbound business from O'ahu. In order for them to economically succeed, cars will be transported to Kaua'i or Maui but likewise bring back a similar number to O'ahu. Under the U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, the privilege clause guarantees an American citizens right to travel where they choose in this country.

It is hypocritical and unfair to single out the Superferry, and once again lose out on another valuable asset for Hawai'i. The list of lost opportunities is long. For instance, the economically challenged southeast flank of the Big Island could have been a major launch site for space industries with Hilo as the gateway to the stars. The telescopes of Mauna Kea paired with the launch sites would have been a smart match and would have spawned vast economic opportunities. It did not happen because of a minority group of protestors.

Just recently, public improvement of state land in Kaka'ako and building smart growth living space in the area by a prominent local firm was stifled by loud, red-shirted protestors at the Capitol. Now much of the state land remains a liability and industrial wasteland. The state does not have the resources to improve much of the land.

Conversely, years ago protestors staged vigorous opposition on the island of Kaua'i to the Barking Sands missile range. In that case, common sense and political leadership did prevail. The Pacific Missile Range Facility at Barking Sands is now an economic asset for Kaua'i, and protects the pristine coastline from future commercial development.

I deeply sympathize with the concept of stabilizing growth in Hawai'i, but the Superferry is not contributing to this problem. It would actually ease transportation woes and make it easier for kama'aina and local small businesses to travel interisland. There are clever ways to stabilize growth in Hawai'i. For instance, legislation has been introduced to license a finite number of visitor accommodations in an effort to curb the unchecked growth of visitor arrivals. The laws of supply and demand would make a stabilized number of visitor accommodations more economically productive.

Hawai'i is in desperate need of economic opportunity, stabilizing growth, diversifying our private-sector single-industry economy, conserving the environment and our way of life. These goals may seem paradoxical but we can achieve them if we make informed decisions. Hopefully, common sense and fairness can replace the hysteria of protestors against the Superferry. That is why the Legislature should convene as soon as possible to have the will of the people reflected in reasonable and fair laws concerning the environment and transportation resources in our harbor. Though we may rectify the law by a special session, Hawai'i has already suffered negative worldwide coverage of this, and the damage may already have been done.

Sen. Fred Hemmings is a Republican representing Senate District 25 (Kailua, Waimanalo, Hawai'i Kai). He wrote this commentary for The Advertiser.