FRESNO, Calif. — In 2002, Lindy Vivas coached the Fresno State women's volleyball team to the most successful season in its history. Two years later, she was fired.

University officials say Vivas failed to meet performance goals or attract enough fans to matches. But her lawyer says she was replaced by a man because she raised her voice to support women athletes in the macho world of Division I college sports and was mocked for it by male colleagues at office parties, staff meetings and on the court.

"When I got there, the department seemed really good and seemed to support all the women's sports," Vivas said during a break from her discrimination trial at Fresno County Superior Court. "But the message that was sent to me later was either sit down and shut up, or something will happen to you."

Advocates for women in sports say Vivas, whose $4.1 million lawsuit could go to a jury as soon as this week, is emblematic of a system that has helped female athletes but failed female coaches.

University officials say it's less complicated than that.

"We had established expectations on performance," Fresno State President John Welty said. "Those expectations were not met."

Thirty-five years after Congress passed Title IX, the landmark federal law requiring gender equity in scholastic athletics, the percentage of women's teams coached by women is at its lowest point ever.

More men also are coaching women's teams than at any other time in history, and the average salaries for coaches of women's teams still trail those of coaches for men's teams, according to an Associated Press review of statistics provided by the NCAA and other groups.

"Title IX opened so many more opportunities for women athletes, but it also made positions coaching women's teams much more attractive to men," said Deborah Rhode, a Stanford University law professor. "Often women are facing barriers to getting those jobs that weren't there when they were competing with other women and running those programs."

Vivas, a Punahou Schools and UCLA graduate, said the more loudly she spoke out on behalf of her athletes, the more hostile the climate became, culminating in "Ugly Women Athlete's Day."

That afternoon in April 2000, she walked into the athletics department's business office and found three male administrators sharing drinks and snacks under a banner featuring crude cutouts of womanly figures with male heads, Vivas said.

University officials, though, said Vivas was fired because she failed to schedule enough matches with top-25 opponents, won too few postseason matches and had a program that often played in empty arenas.

By the time Vivas was fired, the dispute over women's sports had been simmering for years. In 1994, the government found Fresno State was violating Title IX by skimping on opportunities for female athletes. After the school made major changes, the U.S. Department of Education declared it was in compliance in 2001.

Since then, Fresno State has doubled the number of female athletes and increased the budget for women's sports fivefold from 1995 to 2006, said spokeswoman Shirley Armbruster.

The federal government's order forcing Fresno State to implement a gender equity plan set off an on-campus "civil war" between the sexes in the mid-1990s, former staffers said.

Now, more than a decade after the school began making changes, problems are still surfacing. In recent years, two other female ex-employees of the athletics department also sued the school, raising claims similar to those of Vivas. Those cases are still pending.

Title IX bans sexual discrimination by any school that receives federal money. Schools show compliance in many ways: by ensuring the number of athletes matches the gender ratio of the student population, by increasing opportunities for athletes of both genders and by fully accommodating all students' interests.