honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser
Posted on: Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Letters to the Editor

RECYCLING

BOTTLE REDEMPTION: STORES DID IT BEFORE

Fifty-two years ago when I was about 7 years old, my friends and I would collect bottles to redeem. We would get 2 cents for the small bottles and 5 cents for the bigger bottles. A six-pack of small bottles and four big bottles got us into a theater for a movie and also let us purchase popcorn, a hot dog and a soda.

Guess where we redeemed those bottles for the cash? That's right, we returned them to the store that sold the sodas in the first place.

I am not suggesting that anyone do that today to make movie money since movies cost a lot more now. But I am suggesting that it would not be a burden on the stores to collect bottles and cans today.

I get tired of hearing all the griping going on about something as simple as recycling all the 'opala that we generate. If we can take the time to go to a store to buy something for our enjoyment and the store profits from it, then we can extend our responsibility just a little bit more to recycle our waste as well. Both retailer and consumer must join in the effort.

Al Tringali
Honolulu

KAKA'AKO

DEFENSE OF PROJECT IGNORED KEY POINTS

Mr. Richard Fassler's Nov. 18 perspective of Kaka'ako Makai does not include the following points:

  • A&B has stated up front that it will not be able to complete the project unless it sells most of the planned condos to the wealthy — i.e., this is a traditional Hawai'i government contract in which a company and a few government officials will make a substantial profit, and taxpayers will need to pay for the completion of the project and clean up.

  • No funds were available to provide adjacent housing for students, staff, service/support personnel or guests at the new University of Hawai'i Medical Center. Everyone on this island is aware of our transportation problems except HCDA executives, who clearly believe it is better for students, staff, service/support personnel and guests to commute to the medical center, and for the wealthy to commute from their condos to yacht clubs, country clubs, golf courses, shopping malls, etc. This is typical Hawai'i government planning — i.e., ignoring everything except what rolls into one's pocket.

  • Most visitors to Hawai'i arrive by air, and whereas 4,000 Japanese tourists arrive every day expecting a temperate Tokyo, visitors from the rest of the world expect to see a Hawai'i of beaches and swaying palm trees. Kaka'ako Makai is, and will continue to be, that very important first (and last) impression for these tourists, so do we want that image to be one of a temperate Tokyo, or one of "paradise"?

    Rico Leffanta
    Kaka'ako

    SCRAP PLANS

    HCDA'S GRAND VISION HAS DETERIORATED

    The creation of the Hawai'i Community Development Authority was well-intentioned. Thanks to its efforts, Honolulu residents now have balanced recreational options between large, open spaces at Kaka'ako Waterfront Park and thriving shops at Victoria Ward Centers.

    It is unfortunate that the HCDA's grand vision has deteriorated into unnecessary and unwanted development.

    Overwhelming community opposition should be sufficient reason for the HCDA to scrap its plans for the massive A&B development.

    Kristi Sue-Ako
    Kaka'ako

    ROAD, WATER

    FIX THE WILSON TUNNEL

    Many thanks to Robbie Dingeman's "Bureaucracy Buster" article about the Wilson Tunnel. I could not agree more with other readers who have complained about the tunnel. The road surface is so rough that my new car rattles like crazy in the Honolulu-bound lanes. The water streaming down the nice new tiles is most unfortunate. I sincerely hope the state forces the contractor to fix the many problems before accepting the job.

    John Hackney
    Kailua

    NORTH SHORE

    TOO MUCH OF HIGH-SURF AREA IS BEING TAPED OFF

    Winter waves are here again on the North Shore. I understand the safety issues and the need to tape off beach areas to prevent people from venturing into the water and being injured or swept away.

    However, taping off the entire park area of Shark's Cove and Three Tables Beach, blocking access to the bike path and forcing pedestrians and bicyclists into the busy traffic on the road seems excessive.

    In the past, the parking lot and grassy area of Waimea Bay have been closed due to high surf, again excessive, considering the waves do not wash up onto the grass and into the parking lot. This takes away precious ocean views and parking on the North Shore unnecessarily.

    I also wonder who is responsible for taking down the tape after the swell has dropped because too many times in the past the yellow and red tape ends up on the side of the road, tangled in bushes and on the beaches along with the rest of the litter.

    Heather O'Malley
    Hale'iwa

    DRIVER'S LICENSE

    ROAD TEST SHOULD BE MORE CONVENIENT

    A friend of mine needs to take a road test for her driver's license in Hawai'i. The first appointment available is Feb. 6. Her alternative is to get in line at 9 p.m., wait all night and hope for a walk-in appointment the next day.

    I called California and asked for the first appointment in a city in Orange County. Answer: Dec. 7.

    Has our driver's licensing branch considered looking into how other states make this required service workable for their citizens?

    Sue Green
    Kailua

    NAVY CONTRACT

    RESEARCH CENTER WOULD BE ANATHEMA

    The Faculty Senate of the University of Hawai'i's Manoa campus dealt a severe setback to the proposed Navy research center planned for the Manoa campus.

    The Faculty Senate, representing the entire faculty at Manoa, voted by a resounding 31-18 majority to ask the administration to reject the proposed Navy contract. If the administration concurs with the faculty's position, that will be the end of it.

    The Faculty Senate resolution gave numerous good reasons for recommending rejection of the contract. The most fundamental of these was the reminder that the university is a scholarly community that is "governed by the highest ethical standards and humane values."

    In view of earlier unjust wars fought by the United States, such as in Vietnam, Cambodia, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Somalia and Kosovo, our present war in Iraq is only the latest of a series, but it is the very worst by the yardsticks of White House mendacity, cynicism, hypocrisy and arrogance.

    For this university to be collaborating with the Pentagon in its current mode would be a total negation of "the highest ethical standards and humane values" to which our Faculty Senate called attention.

    Oliver Lee
    Affiliate Graduate Faculty of Political Science, University of Hawai'i at Manoa

    SINGAPORE OFFERS SOLUTIONS FOR MANY OF ISLES' PROBLEMS

    Recent letters on homeless in Hawai'i have pointed to Singapore as a best practice in dealing with urban planning challenges in geographically limited spaces. However, there are many other Singaporean best practices Hawai'i could consider, but it would require serious government/community effort to review and implement them. For example:

  • In Singapore, user fees and vehicle and gas taxes fund a 10- to 15-year integrated public transportation and infrastructure plan that prevents gridlock on the roads. In Hawai'i, there are endless debates over potential short-term traffic congestion solutions, and nothing gets done.

  • In Singapore, the government uses a transparent monthly auction of state land under 99-year leases to direct urban development addressing long-term population needs, stabilize property values and capture the highest return for the public coffers. In Hawai'i, government/private sector development deals suddenly appear with preselected vendors followed by a rushed process for public comments and few details on whether Hawai'i is getting the most value for its limited land resources.

  • In Singapore, the government insists that all users of scarce natural resources — land, water, waste disposal, electricity — pay the true cost of consuming those resources. These fees support long-range projects to deal with eventual scarcity, such as land reclamation, desalination plants and waste co-generation electricity plants. In Hawai'i, communities say "not in my back yard" to anything new, and government sidesteps hard funding choices to placate constituents.

  • In Singapore, the government plans for its citizens' future by putting forth long-range goals, with solid solutions for meeting them. It has defined what it wants to be in the future — a global city similar to New York, London, Tokyo — and what is required to get there (physical, social, cultural infrastructure). In Hawai'i, public officials seem only focused on maintaining their tourism paradise crown, with few ideas on developing a diversified economy and cultural base.

    It may be that none of the above Singaporean practices are appropriate to Hawai'i. However, Hawai'i should take a serious and coordinated approach in dealing with its challenges rather than falling into decline due to inaction and indecision.

    Brian Selby
    Singapore

    STATE RELIEF

    EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT IS BEST

    As the legislative session approaches, it is likely that policymakers will again evaluate the merits of providing relief to Hawai'i's taxpayers.

    During the 2005 session, opinions in these pages varied among competing proposals. Increasing the standard deduction and adopting a refundable state earned income tax credit are the two most prominently discussed proposals. While both options have merit, if the intent is to provide relief to low-income working families, the best strategy would be a state EITC.

    The EITC has two very powerful characteristics that are worth noting:

  • The EITC has a positive effect on employment.

  • Historically, the EITC has done more to reduce poverty, particularly among children, than any other tax incentive or social policy.

    As individuals' incomes grow, they become ineligible for many social benefits such as government-sponsored healthcare and food stamps. The EITC cushions this transition to help people stay employed and move toward financial independence. In this sense, it makes work pay.

    In 2003, the federal EITC raised approximately 4.4 million people out of poverty, including 2.4 million children. It is easy to see how the EITC helps struggling working families to become thriving families and members of their communities. A state EITC would provide additional tax relief for families faced with the high cost of living in Hawai'i.

    The primary opponent of a state EITC argues that research shows this is not good tax policy for Hawai'i. In fact, the only research that we are aware of that compares the different tax-relief measures shows that a state EITC would have a greater impact on low-income working families than any other proposal.

    The EITC has been mistakenly called "back-door welfare," and opponents claim that it is subject to abuse. The EITC creates a strong incentive to work without the reliance on government assistance; this is the exact opposite of welfare.

    While the EITC is not perfect, the Internal Revenue Service's taxpayer advocate doesn't think the EITC is a major problem in the tax code, and has repeatedly questioned the research methods of a 2002 study that identified overpayment as a concern. This dated and discredited study is the only review of EITC overpayment, and many agree that its claims are overblown, yet naysayers continue to cite it as "evidence" of EITC fraud and abuse.

    If the goal is to provide tax relief to those who need it most, there are no rational arguments against a refundable state EITC in Hawai'i. The EITC has broad bipartisan support across the country, and supporting a policy that creates more working families while significantly reducing poverty is a strategy that all elected officials should want to champion.

    Brent Dillabaugh
    Public policy director, Hawai'i Alliance for Community Based Economic Development